• From: "Anders W. Tell" <anderst@t...>
• To: "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...>
• Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 09:44:55 +0200

"Stephen D. Williams" wrote:

> roddey@u... wrote:
>
> > Actually, to be fair, there would be a somewhat non-trivial amount of bit
> > fiddlin' to get it out of whatever canonical binary format you put it in,
> > into the local byte order, floating point representation, byte boundary
> > alignment, etc... Though hopefully that couldn't be any worse than parsing
> > :-)
>
> Not true, especially for Java....
>
> ...

> The byte order, etc. will be Java standard.  Shouldn't be too tough for C/C++, etc.

Its also very easy for C/C++,  There exists a number of standards and OpenSource
packages which support them.
After this "bit fiddling" have been taken care of,  the road is clear of obstacles.


/anders
--
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
/  Financial Toolsmiths AB  /
/  Anders W. Tell           /
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Is there anyone working on a binary version of XML?
    • From: roddey@u...
  • Re: Is there anyone working on a binary version of XML?
    • From: "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...>

• Prev by Date: OFF: Attachments to list
• Next by Date: Re: OFF: Attachments to list
• Previous by thread: Re: Is there anyone working on a binary version of XML?
• Next by thread: Re: Is there anyone working on a binary version of XML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread