• From: roddey@u...
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 12:51:26 -0600

>Imagine that you have all the features of XML: structure, flexibility,
common format for
>interchange, but that you perform zero processing steps to import or
export the 'document'
>from a program.  (Actually, I'm thinking this would be done in chunks, but
essentially very
>few reads and writes.)
>

Actually, to be fair, there would be a somewhat non-trivial amount of bit
fiddlin' to get it out of whatever canonical binary format you put it in,
into the local byte order, floating point representation, byte boundary
alignment, etc... Though hopefully that couldn't be any worse than parsing
:-)



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Is there anyone working on a binary version of XML?
    • From: "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...>

• Prev by Date: RE: (waaay off topic) RE: LISTADMIN: No attachments to list mess ages PLEASE
• Next by Date: RE: xhtml and the p tag
• Previous by thread: Re: XML query language
• Next by thread: Re: Is there anyone working on a binary version of XML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread