Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Roger L. Costello wrote: > Okay, here's where the rub comes. Let me give you a couple of quotes > from the RDF spec (the *'s I have put in and are my way of emphasizing > the words that I wish for you to really focus on): "Property names > *must* be associated with a schema. This can be done by qualifying the > element names with a namespace prefix to unambigously *connect* the > property definition with the corresponding RDF schema ..." Watch the modal verbs! Property names *must* be associated with a schema, but this can (i.e. *may*) be done by making the URI to which the namespace prefix is bound the actual URI of the schema document. There may be other ways to do it. Besides, RDF is free to set tighter limits on the URIs used to identify namespaces than XML in general. XML-based standards can always set extra requirements, like the SMIL requirement (clause 5.1) that there be no internal DTD subset in SMIL documents. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@c... You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5) xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
