• From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• To: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@m...>, <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:32:56 -0500

From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
>    The closest we have today is XSL which is not currently a fair
>comparison to LISP (e.g. try writing a compiler or word processor in XSL
>:-))


I like to use XML to do compositions of components, which encompases the
declaritive rather than the proceedural aspects of programming. What I
like is that a schema can then validate a composition, allowing clients
to send a composition to a server to construct an agent, but without the
security problems that you would otherwise have.

Bill



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Opening SAX for better filter support
• Next by Date: Re: RDF not conforming to the Namespace spec?
• Previous by thread: Re: Namespaces and DTDs
• Next by thread: FW: Namespaces and DTDs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread