• From: David Brownell <db@E...>
• To: "Richard L. Goerwitz" <richard@g...>
• Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 13:32:31 -0800

"Richard L. Goerwitz" wrote:
> 
> David Brownell wrote:
> 
> > And more to the point, XML processors aren't required
> > to report such low level character encoding errors ...
> > this would be one.
> 
> On the face of things, this doesn't make sense.

For example, character encodings are typically handled
many layers below the XML processor.  That processor
shouldn't be faulted for behaviors of the underlying
processor.

- Dave

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: Encoding detection again ...
    • From: Miles Sabin <msabin@c...>
  • Re: Encoding detection again ...
    • From: David Brownell <db@E...>
  • Re: Encoding detection again ...
    • From: "Richard L. Goerwitz" <richard@g...>

• Prev by Date: Java Specification Request for XML
• Next by Date: RE: Encoding detection again ...
• Previous by thread: Re: Encoding detection again ...
• Next by thread: RE: Encoding detection again ...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread