• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 16:03:25 -0500

Richard L. Goerwitz wrote:

> On the face of things, this doesn't make sense.

For example, a document containing P and otherwise error-free
may be processed without error, although U+0080 is not a
legal Unicode character.

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: Encoding detection again ...
    • From: Miles Sabin <msabin@c...>
  • Re: Encoding detection again ...
    • From: David Brownell <db@E...>
  • Re: Encoding detection again ...
    • From: "Richard L. Goerwitz" <richard@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML and special Characters : unicode v3.0 ?
• Next by Date: Java Specification Request for XML
• Previous by thread: Re: Encoding detection again ...
• Next by thread: Re: Encoding detection again ...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread