• From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@b...>
• To: "'xml-dev@i...'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 18:39:44 +0000 (GMT)

On Sat, 20 Mar 1999, Patrice Bonhomme wrote:
> I am looking for an RDF DTD ? Why is there a "Formal Grammar" for RDF and not 
> a DTD ?

There is no DTD for the RDF syntax because RDF data is likely to be
embedded in a variety of different document types. Also the RDF
syntax uses a variety of element and attribute names to represent
intermingled  classes, properties and resource drawing on multiple
independently defined vocabularies. This is pretty much impossible to
anticipate in a single monolithic "RDF DTD". 

Dan



--
Daniel.Brickley@b...                  
Institute for Learning and Research Technology http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
University of Bristol,  Bristol BS8 1TN, UK.   phone:+44(0)117-9287096


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RDF DTD ?
    • From: Patrice Bonhomme <Patrice.Bonhomme@l...>

• Prev by Date: RDF DTD ?
• Next by Date: Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
• Previous by thread: RDF DTD ?
• Next by thread: Re: RDF DTD ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread