• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• To: "Dan Brickley" <Daniel.Brickley@b...>,<xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 13:18:29 +1100

I have written an XML DTD fragment for RDF and put it online at
http://xml.ascc.net/xml/en/utf-8/resource-index.html

I don't see why RDF WG didn't put XML declarations in: perhaps
they were tired--certainly it was not difficult to make. A DTD would
help many users, and also allow more informed commentary on the
comparative virtues of RDF-schema and the various schema proposals.

A combination of this DTD and an XSL-based structure validator should
be enough to check all the structural constraints in RDF.

Rick Jelliffe


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RDF DTD ?
    • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
• Next by Date: Re: IE5.0 does not conform to RFC2376
• Previous by thread: Re: RDF DTD ?
• Next by thread: Re: RDF DTD ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread