• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 06:55:30 -0500 (EST)

John Cowan writes:

 > Lars Marius Garshol scripsit:
 > 
 > > You can anyway, if you just use a Vector or some equivalent as the
 > > property value.
 > 
 > Vectors are no real substitute for indexed properties, because they
 > require exposing the collection rather than just its elements,
 > and the bean can't get control when an element is changed.

Either John is misinterpreting Lars or I am.  I thought that Lars
meant using a vector containing the index and the value, not a vector
of all the possible values.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Proposed new kind of SAX2 thing, with example
    • From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@i...>
  • Re: Proposed new kind of SAX2 thing, with example
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: A Line in the Declarative Syntax Sand(Was: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG))
• Next by Date: Interface name quandry again ...
• Previous by thread: Re: Proposed new kind of SAX2 thing, with example
• Next by thread: Re: Proposed new kind of SAX2 thing, with example
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread