• From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@i...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: 28 Mar 1999 12:07:29 +0200

* David Megginson
| 
| Use the following from Parser2 (née ModParser):
| 
|     public abstract Object get (String prop)
| 	throws SAXNotSupportedException;

* John Cowan
| 
| Ah.  In that case, please add another get method with an index
| value, and ditto for set.  This way we can have indexed properties.

You can anyway, if you just use a Vector or some equivalent as the
property value.

--Lars M.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Proposed new kind of SAX2 thing, with example
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• References:
  • Re: Proposed new kind of SAX2 thing, with example
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: IDL for SAX2
• Next by Date: Re: Is there anyone working on a binary version of XML?
• Previous by thread: Re: Proposed new kind of SAX2 thing, with example
• Next by thread: Re: Proposed new kind of SAX2 thing, with example
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread