• From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@b...>
• To: "'xml-dev@i...'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 20:54:03 +0000 (GMT)

On Thu, 25 Mar 1999, DuCharme, Robert wrote:

> >I know, I know, this is anathema to what many of you feel is the 
> >essence of XML, and I agree to a point.
> 
> It's not so much about feelings, as about contradicting the XML spec.

Quite so. But there are still initiatives such as 

	http://www.wapforum.org/docs/technical.htm
	http://www.wapforum.org/docs/technical1.1/WBXML-03-Feb-1999.pdf

which attempts to define a 'compact binary representation of XML'.
(If going down that route, I'd rather have a compact binary
representation of whatever it was that I'm representing in XML, rather
than of the XML that I might've used as a textual representation of the
data... But then that really wouldn't be XML.)

Dan


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Is there anyone working on a binary version of XML?
    • From: "Peter Stark" <stark@u...>

• References:
  • RE: Is there anyone working on a binary version of XML?
    • From: "DuCharme, Robert" <DuCharmR@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX2 RFD: LexicalHandler draft v.1.1
• Next by Date: RE: Whence XQL?
• Previous by thread: RE: Is there anyone working on a binary version of XML?
• Next by thread: RE: Is there anyone working on a binary version of XML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread