• From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• To: "Gabe Beged-Dov" <begeddov@j...>
• Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 15:46:36 -0500

From: Gabe Beged-Dov <begeddov@j...>
>The SAX filter registration interfaces don't allow multiple filters to be registered for the
>same feature.  I don't see how you can have more than one owner for all the registered
>handlers without getting into severe trouble. This is not a bad thing as you probably want
>something like MDSAX to handle the filter networks. It allows SAX(2) to be lean and mean.


Frankly, I would love to see the design process for MDSAX2 as open as SAX.

Bill


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SAX2 RFD: LexicalHandler draft v.1.1
    • From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Is there anyone working on a binary version of XML?
• Next by Date: RE: Is there anyone working on a binary version of XML?
• Previous by thread: RE: SAX2 RFD: LexicalHandler draft v.1.1
• Next by thread: Re: SAX2 RFD: LexicalHandler draft v.1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread