Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Serrat Jaime - jasr wrote: > But I'm still left wondering about the schema related proposals. NOTE or > not, no pun, did the SOX submitters intend it to supercede DTD? Was RDF > (and DCD?) meant to *extend* DTD? RDF Schemas are totally separate from the other schema proposals and have nothing to do with them. They are schemas that describe metadata classes and properties, and have nothing to do with elements and attributes. (They are *expressed* using elements and attributes, but that's another thing.) The current schema proposals on the table are XML-Data (in IE5, but probably moribund), DCD, SOX, and DDML. None of them is official anything. They support various subsets and supersets of DTDs. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@c... You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5) xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
