[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Next Round

• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 15:03:04 -0500

Chris Maden wrote:

> As far as I can tell, the biggest problem is the possibility that a
> prefix's meaning can change within a document.  But your processor
> should be operating on URI+suffix, not the prefix, and changing a
> mapping table can't be *that* hard.

Except for DTD-based validation, which has to stay backward
compatible.  So either we heave over DTD's altogether, or we
apply Tim's algorithm (which unquestionably works, but at a price).
 
> True, I'm not a sophisticated programmer, and I may be overlooking
> something.  But I have a hard time seeing Tim Bray and James Clark
> bulled by political pressure, even (especially?) from Microsoft.

How about from W3C staff?  After all, the PI-based version of
the namespace rec made it almost all the way up before being vetoed,
as I understand (I wasn't there, so I speak under correction).
 
-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Next Round
    • From: Chris Maden <crism@o...>

• References:
  • Re: Next Round
    • From: Chris Maden <crism@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: OSS vs W3C? was: Next Round
• Next by Date: Re: SAX: Next Round
• Previous by thread: Re: Forums
• Next by thread: Re: Next Round
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread