Re: Namespaces, modules and architectures paper available
I appreciate the simplicity of this proposal, but want to check that it is not too simple to get the job done. How would you pass information into a module with this proposal? For instance, I might want to include a table model, but might need to specify the contents of the table's cell elements from the containing DTD. Also, it feels "nicer" to me to have the instance structure control namespace lookup so that when I am in a MATH::FORMULA element, I can use elements from the MATH module without qualification. This convention could remove most or all qualification from a document instance and thus make things simpler for authors. For instance: <!DOCTYPE ...[ <!ENTITY math SYSTEM "math.mod" MODULE>%math; ]> ... <INTEGRAL/> <!-- a really important part --> <MATH> <!-- not ambiguous at this scope --> <INTEGRAL/> <!-- a mathematical integral --> </MATH> I would like it if the containing element would control namescope choice. Paul Prescod -- http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco  It should appear here soon: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/archives/xml-dev/9802/index.html xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format