[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Namespaces, Architectural Forms, and Sub-Documents

• From: David Megginson <ak117@f...>
• To: xml-dev Mailing List <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 4 Feb 1998 10:06:58 -0500

It seems to me that when you want to embed large contiguous structures
from different document types in an XML document, each different
namespace should be its own sub-document, referenced as a binary
entity (or using whatever other mechanisms are available in XML-Link).

Good tools and protocols should make it possible to create, transmit,
and process compound documents as if they were single files.  This
will be necessary anyway for supporting multimedia.

Here are some general guidelines:

* Architectural forms are most suitable for applications where
  multiple inheritance is required, or where elements belonging to a
  different document type are scattered throughout a document.

* Sub-documents are most suitable for applications where all of the
  element belonging to a different document type are rooted in a
  single subtree. 

"namespace:gi" element type names are unsuitable for several reasons:

1) The complexity of namespaces is exposed to the author rather than
   hidden in the DTD (as it is, optionally, with architectural forms).

2) Multiple inheritance is not possible (X can be a kind of Y or a
   kind of Z, but not both).

3) Standard DTD-based validation is not possible, and it is more
   difficult to create DTD-driven authoring tools.

4) Both architectural forms and sub-documents can be fully supported
   under the existing spec by _both_ validating and non-validating XML
   parsers: no changes necessary.  Furthermore, they will also remain
   compatible with SGML tools.

Why are people worried about writing specs to solve a problem that
already has good, working, available solutions?


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 ak117@f...
Microstar Software Ltd.         dmeggins@m...
      http://home.sprynet.com/sprynet/dmeggins/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Namespaces, Architectural Forms, and Sub-Documents
    • From: Paul Prescod <papresco@t...>
  • Re: Namespaces, Architectural Forms, and Sub-Documents
    • From: Chris Maden <crism@o...>

• References:
  • Namespaces, modules and architectures paper available
    • From: Paul Prescod <papresco@t...>
  • Re: Namespaces, modules and architectures paper available
    • From: Paul Prescod <papresco@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespaces, modules and architectures paper available
• Next by Date: FORTRAN namelist input - remember? Replace with XML!
• Previous by thread: Re: Namespaces, modules and architectures paper available
• Next by thread: Re: Namespaces, Architectural Forms, and Sub-Documents
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread