• From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>
• To: Gavin Nicol <gtn@e...>
• Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 09:37:05 -0600

Gavin Nicol wrote:
> 
> >Perhaps to start the ball rolling, I'll ask if anyone has used Lark or NXP
> >(Java-based).  I've used both.  What are you looking for in Parsers?  Is the
> >API that Lark and NXP offer reasonable?  Would you want to build in sgmls,
> >SP, sgmlc, etc.?
> 
> I think that we should define a common parser API.

Second that.  The lack of this and a *standard* way to define 
the parser output (eg., what esis should do but doesn't, and 
grove/grove plans can do) have plagued SGML systems for years.
A proposal for this is something that can be worked on a 
development list.

len bullard
lockheed martin

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Suggested List Protocol
    • From: gtn@e... (Gavin Nicol)

• References:
  • Re: Suggested List Protocol
    • From: gtn@e... (Gavin Nicol)

• Prev by Date: Re: Suggested List Protocol
• Next by Date: Re: Suggested List Protocol
• Previous by thread: Re: Suggested List Protocol
• Next by thread: Re: Suggested List Protocol
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread