• From: gtn@e... (Gavin Nicol)
• To: cbullard@h...
• Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 10:59:45 -0500

>Second that.  The lack of this and a *standard* way to define 
>the parser output (eg., what esis should do but doesn't, and 
>grove/grove plans can do) have plagued SGML systems for years.
>A proposal for this is something that can be worked on a 
>development list.

Quite. I think we can model these objects in a number of ways
though. I would personally like to define the objects in IDL
*and* SGML... (for information on IDL etc. look at www.omg.org).



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Suggested List Protocol
    • From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>

• References:
  • Re: Suggested List Protocol
    • From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Suggested List Protocol
• Next by Date: XML API specification
• Previous by thread: Re: Suggested List Protocol
• Next by thread: Re: Suggested List Protocol
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread