XML Editor
Sign up for a WebBoard account Sign Up Keyword Search Search More Options... Options
search
Chat Rooms Chat Help Help News News Log in to WebBoard Log in Not Logged in
Home » Boards » Stylus Studio Developer Network » Stylus Studio Technical Forum » Is this really well-formed?
Conferences Close Tree View
+ Stylus Studio Feature Requests (1192)
- Stylus Studio Technical Forum (14621)
-> + edi converter - java fails (10)
-> + ddtek:serialize (3)
-> - File explorer view (1)
-> - Java Extension Functions (1)
-> + err:FODC0004 (18)
-> - Removing Attributes when Null (1)
-> + CDATA preservation (6)
-> + Help converting xml report to ... (2)
-> + Converting text to XML issue (3)
-> - example not working (1)
-> + XML Editing (2)
-> + Multiple EDI messages within s... (5)
-> + Mapping RDBMS and XML Schema t... (2)
-> + MySQL Database importing (2)
-> + XSD validation using XSV fails... (3)
-> - Is this really well-formed? (3)
-> ->Is this really well-forme...
-> ->Is this really well-forme...
-> + HL7 EDI to XML problems -'ORU_... (11)
-> + How do I modify the Xquery to ... (2)
-> + XML mapping difficulty (3)
-> + XLST Conversion (2)
-- Previous [541-560] [561-580] [581-600] Next
+ Website Feedback (249)
+ XSLT Help and Discussion (7625)
+ XQuery Help and Discussion (2017)
+ Stylus Studio FAQs (159)
+ Stylus Studio Code Samples & Utilities (364)
+ Stylus Studio Announcements (113)
Topic  
Postnext
Neal WaltersSubject: Is this really well-formed?
Author: Neal Walters
Date: 09 May 2010 06:49 PM
I had an odd-ball case where IE was not showing the XML, so I brought it to StylusStudio (2008 1050g), which also said it was well formed.

<ns0:DataRequest xmlns:ns0="https://abc.com/DataRequest">
<ns5:DataResponseEntitlements xmlns="https://abc.com/DataResponseEntitlements"/>
</ns0:DataRequest>

It's missing the ns5 on the xmlns:.

I was using a special-case text scrubber to cause this odd scenario, so it was my bug. But I assumed StylusStudio would help identify the error faster, and it didn't.

Thanks,
Neal Walters
Postnext
(Deleted User) Subject: Is this really well-formed?
Author: (Deleted User)
Date: 11 May 2010 10:30 AM
Hi Neal,
well-formedness is less restrictive than namespace validity, so that's why the missing prefix definition wasn't detected.

Alberto
Posttop
Neal WaltersSubject: Is this really well-formed?
Author: Neal Walters
Date: 11 May 2010 08:50 PM
Ok, maybe this could be a feature request then. I believe it's something a software tool should definitely, instead of relying on "eyeballs". Maybe you could have a WC3 Validate, and a Super-Strong Validate.

Neal

   
Download A Free Trial of Stylus Studio 6 XML Professional Edition Today! Powered by Stylus Studio, the world's leading XML IDE for XML, XSLT, XQuery, XML Schema, DTD, XPath, WSDL, XHTML, SQL/XML, and XML Mapping!  
go

Log In Options

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Stylus Scoop XML Newsletter:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2016 All Rights Reserved.