Subject: RE: First public working draft of XSLT 2.1
From: "Vladimir Nesterovsky" <vladimir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 01:07:17 -0700
|
> I think, that the new xsl:evaluate instruction is the most harmful
addition
..
> the worst effect will be from developers who
> will widely practice the "easiest" way to achieve desired
> effect with dynamic xpath.
>> Of course there is a risk that some users will misuse the feature,
>> but I don't think that's a very good argument for not making it
available.
Contrary, I think that a high risk of misuse is an important argument
weighing the value of a feature.
This way, for example, the last generation of programmig languages do
not include pointers or restricts them (even C++x will ban some use of
pointers) preventing their invalid, unsafe, unsecure use.
--
Vladimir Nesterovsky
http://www.nesterovsky-bros.com/
| Current Thread |
|
Vladimir Nesterovsky - 16 May 2010 08:08:28 -0000 <=
|
|