Subject: Re: Re: First public working draft of XSLT 2.1
From: Dave Pawson <davep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 14:48:20 +0100
|
On Sat, 15 May 2010 14:40:10 +0300
"Vladimir Nesterovsky" <vladimir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I understand your concerns but feel that you may be forgetting many
> > very useful use cases
> I understand that there will be use cases almost for any feature,
> whatever.
Going back to XSL, pre xslt, IIRC it was the introduction of eval
that caused the uproar which had quite a few consequences.
It was universally disliked, and I'm surprised the WG have raised it
again. Or perhaps the group has had a full turnover.
Probably on the mulberrytech archive somewhere.
regards
--
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
|