RE: [MISC] How was the XSLT 2.0 norm written (tools,

Play the video

Subject: RE: [MISC] How was the XSLT 2.0 norm written (tools, format)
From: Syd Bauman <Syd_Bauman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:12:59 -0500

> For the next version of XSLT I've also added tools that will
> generate SVG diagrams from source XML descriptions of trees.

Don't suppose you plan to make this snippet public? 


> Have you considered docbook? The xmlspec system is a bit
> specialized.

Seconded. Although I presonally use TEI for this sort of thing,
that's because I'm so familiar with it. DocBook is probably the
system best suited to general technical documentation.

Current Thread

Re: [MISC] How was the XSLT 2.0 norm written (tools, format), (continued)
- Abel Braaksma - 22 Jan 2010 22:29:07 -0000
  - Michael Kay - 22 Jan 2010 23:30:57 -0000
    - David Carlisle - 23 Jan 2010 11:02:08 -0000
- Michael Kay - 22 Jan 2010 23:24:50 -0000
  - Syd Bauman - 23 Jan 2010 23:13:33 -0000 <=
    - Michael Kay - 24 Jan 2010 00:14:37 -0000
    - Vyacheslav Sedov - 24 Jan 2010 05:37:16 -0000
    - Michael Kay - 24 Jan 2010 12:03:48 -0000
    - Vyacheslav Sedov - 24 Jan 2010 13:12:04 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [MISC] How was the XSLT 2, Michael Kay	Thread	RE: [MISC] How was the XSLT 2, Michael Kay
Re: Just Heard About Symphony, Vyacheslav Sedov	Date	RE: [MISC] How was the XSLT 2, Michael Kay
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >