Re: [MISC] How was the XSLT 2.0 norm written (tools,

Play the video

Subject: Re: [MISC] How was the XSLT 2.0 norm written (tools, format)
From: Vyacheslav Sedov <vyacheslav.sedov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 08:36:52 +0300

i guess OpenOffice is best authoring tool - is not it?

2010/1/24 Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> > For the next version of XSLT I've also added tools that
>> will generate
>> > SVG diagrams from source XML descriptions of trees.
>>
>> Don't suppose you plan to make this snippet public?
>>
>
> I'll focus my efforts on getting the spec out first. Then ask me how it was
> done.
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/
> http://twitter.com/michaelhkay

Current Thread

Re: [MISC] How was the XSLT 2.0 norm written (tools, format), (continued)
- Michael Kay - 22 Jan 2010 23:24:50 -0000
  - Syd Bauman - 23 Jan 2010 23:13:33 -0000
    - Michael Kay - 24 Jan 2010 00:14:37 -0000
    - Vyacheslav Sedov - 24 Jan 2010 05:37:16 -0000 <=
    - Michael Kay - 24 Jan 2010 12:03:48 -0000
    - Vyacheslav Sedov - 24 Jan 2010 13:12:04 -0000
    - List Owner - 24 Jan 2010 15:12:00 -0000
    - Message not available
    - Vyacheslav Sedov - 24 Jan 2010 15:33:09 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [MISC] How was the XSLT 2, Michael Kay	Thread	RE: [MISC] How was the XSLT 2, Michael Kay
Re: question on support of st, Hermann Stamm-Wilbra	Date	RE: [MISC] How was the XSLT 2, Michael Kay
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >