Different from Mukul and Mike..


	<xsl:template match="Orders">
		<xsl:variable name = "selected-group">
			<xsl:for-each-group  select="*" group-starting-with=  "StartOrderGroup">
				<xsl:for-each-group  select="current-group()" group-ending-with=
"EndOrderGroup">
					<order-group>
						<xsl:copy-of  select="current-group()"/>
					</order-group>
				</xsl:for-each-group>
			</xsl:for-each-group>
		</xsl:variable>
		<xsl:for-each select = "$selected-group/order-group[StartOrderGroup]">
			<xsl:text>&#xa;</xsl:text>
			<xsl:text> Order </xsl:text>
			<xsl:value-of select = "StartOrderGroup/Id"/>
			<xsl:text>&#xa;</xsl:text>
			<xsl:for-each select = "*[not(self::StartOrderGroup or
self::EndOrderGroup)]">
				<xsl:text> &#xa; </xsl:text>
				<xsl:value-of select = "name()"/>
				<xsl:text> : </xsl:text>
				<xsl:value-of select = "Id"/>
			</xsl:for-each>
			<xsl:text>&#xa;</xsl:text>
		</xsl:for-each>
	</xsl:template>

Which ever Suits..
Vasu

2008/12/22 Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Here is a different algorithm, than Mike
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
> <xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
>                       version="2.0">
>
>  <xsl:output method="text" />
>
>  <xsl:template match="Orders">
>    <xsl:for-each-group select="*" group-starting-with="StartOrderGroup">
>      <xsl:text>&#xa;Order&#xa;</xsl:text>
>      <xsl:text>-----&#xa;</xsl:text>
>      <xsl:variable name="curr-group" select="current-group()" />
>      <xsl:variable name="indx" select="index-of(for $x in $curr-group
> return $x/local-name(), 'EndOrderGroup')" />
>      <xsl:for-each select="$curr-group[position() &gt; 1 and
> position() &lt; $indx]">
>        <xsl:value-of select="local-name()" /> - <xsl:value-of
> select="Id" /><xsl:text>&#xa;</xsl:text>
>      </xsl:for-each>
>    </xsl:for-each-group>
>  </xsl:template>
>
> </xsl:stylesheet>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Fredde Hedberg <syte_orion@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> The problem is solvable with XSLT, provided your input XML
>>> is well
>>> formed. But your input is not a valid XML document.
>>>
>>> for e.g., <Id=1/> is not a valid XML fragment, and
>>> XML parser
>>> complains about it.
>>
>> My mistake, I apologize. When I simplified my XML I made it more bad formed than it really is...
>>
>> <Orders>
>>  <StartOrderGroup>
>>    <Id>1</Id>
>>  </StartOrderGroup>
>>  <Car>
>>    <Id>2</Id>
>>  </Car>
>>  <Car>
>>    <Id>3</Id>
>>  </Car>
>>  <Bus>
>>    <Id>4</Id>
>>  </Bus>
>>  <EndOrderGroup>
>>    <Id>5</Id>
>>  </EndOrderGroup>
>>  <Car>
>>    <Id>6</Id>
>>  </Car>
>>  <Truck>
>>    <Id>7</Id>
>>  </Truck>
>>  <StartOrderGroup>
>>    <Id>8</Id>
>>  </StartOrderGroup>
>>  <Truck>
>>    <Id>9</Id>
>>  </Truck>
>>  <EndOrderGroup>
>>    <Id>10</Id>
>>  </EndOrderGroup>
>> </Orders>
>>
>> That's at least valid XML :)
>> You've given me hope by saying it is solvable. Will this new XML-fragment allow you to show me how? That would basically save christmas for me...
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Fredde
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Mukul Gandhi
>
>



-- 
Vasu Chakkera
Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd.
Oxford
www.vasucv.com