Re: xsltproc/LibXSLT - non-compliance?

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 02:56:09PM +0200, Manfred Staudinger wrote:
> > On 30/04/2008, Michael Ludwig <mlu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >  I'd still be interested to know if (a) there is more to LibXSLT's
> >  >  non-conformance
> What I posted in a parallel thread
> http://www.biglist.com/cgi-bin/wilma/wilma_hiliter/xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/200804/msg00515.html?line=8#hilite
> may well turn out to be such a non-conformance.

Please report it on the gnom xml list for libxml/libxslt,
or using bugzilla, if it's a bug.

I don't think that libxslt is particularly more or less strictly
conformant to the spec than other implementations I've tried.
I've yet to see a piece of software that's perfect; the questions
to ask are, is it good enough to use, and if I report bugs, do they
get fixed...

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ * http://www.fromoldbooks.org/