Re: xsltproc/LibXSLT - non-compliance?

Subject: Re: xsltproc/LibXSLT - non-compliance?
From: Michael Ludwig <mlu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:35:54 +0200

David Carlisle schrieb:

Well, in this case the argument *does* evaluate to a string that is a
QName. It consequently matches the quoted description.


No, it evaluates to a nodeset with one node whose string value matches
QName. That is not the same as evaluating to a string.


Okay - "evaluation" is defined as what happens prior to any automatic
conversion that may apply. I lumped both together.

Is this interpretation of your words correct?
yes

Thanks for clarifying!

Michael

Current Thread
Re: xsltproc/LibXSLT - non-compliance?, (continued) Manfred Staudinger - 30 Apr 2008 15:13:55 -0000 David Carlisle - 30 Apr 2008 15:38:46 -0000 Michael Ludwig - 30 Apr 2008 15:56:31 -0000 David Carlisle - 30 Apr 2008 16:18:20 -0000 Michael Ludwig - 30 Apr 2008 16:36:18 -0000 <= Michael Kay - 1 May 2008 01:06:33 -0000 Liam Quin - 1 May 2008 01:53:57 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: xsltproc/LibXSLT - non-co, David Carlisle	Thread	RE: xsltproc/LibXSLT - non-co, Michael Kay
Re: xsltproc/LibXSLT - non-co, David Carlisle	Date	Re: Checking for Cycles in a , Darcy Parker
	Month

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3


	Stylus Studio® Developer Network \| Contact Us \| Email this page