RE: Calling subdocuments with processing directives

Play the video

Subject: RE: Calling subdocuments with processing directives
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:46:03 +0100

> It is because there is no defined order that I find it 
> counter intuitive to have to make what is essentially and 
> order specification. From a functional point of view a key 
> really should aggregate IMHO.

But someone has to tell it what to aggregate over. A function expects to be
told what its input is.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

Current Thread
RE: Calling subdocuments with processing directives, (continued) Michael Kay - 26 Oct 2007 16:34:43 -0000 Steven Ericsson-Zenith - 26 Oct 2007 16:51:58 -0000 Michael Kay - 26 Oct 2007 17:41:52 -0000 Steven Ericsson-Zenith - 26 Oct 2007 18:35:06 -0000 Michael Kay - 26 Oct 2007 18:46:42 -0000 <= Steven Ericsson-Zenith - 26 Oct 2007 19:22:42 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: Calling subdocuments with, Steven Ericsson-Zeni	Thread	Re: Calling subdocuments with, Steven Ericsson-Zeni
Re: Calling subdocuments with, Steven Ericsson-Zeni	Date	Re: 'number-rows-spanned' doe, J.Pietschmann
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3


	Stylus Studio® Developer Network \| Contact Us \| Email this page