[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 23:37:39 -0600, Colin Paul Adams
<colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am not talking about compiling to .NET - this would give very bad performance - In comparison to? Being the slowest browser-based XSLT 2.0 processor only matters when there are other browser-based XSLT 2.0 processors to compare yourself against. And in the mean time being the first browser-based XSLT 2.0 processor means that, regardless of its native counter part, Gestalt would be the fastest browser-based XSLT 2.0 processor, and everyone else would be playing catch-up. In other words, this would give very bad performance In comparison to? -- /M:D M. David Peterson http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 | http://dev.aol.com/blog/3155
|

Cart



