Re: Taking flat XML and parsing into multi level nexte
>> Instead of Muenchian, if you really *have* to stick to XSLT 1.0, > ^^^^^^^^ > > The Muenchian method is defined and used with XSLT 1.0, why users who > have to stick to XSLT 1.0 should not use it? > In this particular case, I think that the tree-walking algorithm suits better than the Muenchian grouping method with keys (which may yield an interesting discussion on its own). Someone did come up with a good tree walking solution, not sure if a similar thing with Muenchian would be equally easy/hard (I'll leave the comparison of the two for this case to others). > > P.S. > Abel, I tried to reach you via email, probably do not have your > correct email address. I see it now. It got filed in the xsl archive instead in my normal inbox. Answer underway ;) Cheers, -- Abel Braaksma
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format