Subject: RE: What's wrong with my ancestor syntax?
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 23:55:03 +0100
|
Your menuItem element doesn't have an ancestor called pageID so
ancestor-or-self::pageID will select nothing.
I'm not really sure what you want but you seem to need descendants rather
than ancestors.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Austin, Darrel [mailto:Darrel.Austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 26 March 2007 22:59
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: What's wrong with my ancestor syntax?
>
> I'm trying to use ancestor-or-self.
>
> Here's a sample of the XML:
> <menuItems>
> <menuItem>
> <pageID>938</pageID>
> <browserTitle>Home Page</browserTitle>
> <lastUpdate>2006/06/12</lastUpdate>
> <menuItem>
> <pageID>998</pageID>
> <browserTitle>District Administration</browserTitle>
> <lastUpdate>2006/06/06</lastUpdate>
> </menuItem>
> </menuItem>
> <menuItems>
>
> This is the XML that forms our site menu. I want to create an
> RSS feed that lists the most recent 10 pages that have been
> changed under a certain node of the menu.
>
> So, for this example, I want to pass in the page ID of '938'
> and return both '938' and any child page underneath it.
>
> Here's the XSL:
>
> <xsl:param name="pageID">1</xsl:param>
>
> <xsl:template match="/">
> <xsl:for-each
> select="*/menuItem[ancestor-or-self::pageID = $pageID]">
> <xsl:sort select="substring(@lastUpdate,1,4)"
> order="descending" /> <!-- year -->
> <xsl:sort select="substring(@lastUpdate,6,2)"
> order="descending" /> <!-- month -->
> <xsl:sort select="substring(@lastUpdate,9,2)"
> order="descending" /> <!-- day -->
> <xsl:call-template name="createItem" />
> </xsl:for-each>
> </xsl:template>
>
> <xsl:template name="createItem">
> lastUpdate: <xsl:value-of select="lastUpdate"/>
> browserTitle: <xsl:value-of select="browserTitle"/>
> pageID: <xsl:value-of select="pageID"/> </xsl:template>
>
> Originally, I had 'descendant-or-self' by mistake which
> obviously gave me the exact opposite of what I wanted and
> returned the specific node and all PARENT pages that matched.
> So I changed to ancestor-or-self and now it doesn't appear to
> match anything. I'm not sure why. Is my logic a bit off?
>
> -Darrel
|