Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>"Erik" == Erik Wilde <net.dret@xxxxxxxx> writes: if anybody could mention if this really is the case, i would be most grateful. http://www.w3.org/TR/xinclude/#infoset to me looks as if the "must" parts are all satisfied by the infoset view of xslt, whereas the "may" parts ("include history" and "language" properties) definitely are a problem. but they are optional. and while i am at asking questions about xinclude (i am sorry for this being a complete non-xslt question): is anybody aware of a test suite for xinclude? there are some exotic things in there (handling notations, for example) and it would be good to have a set of test files and expected results. http://www.w3.org/XML/Test/XInclude/ talks about being a conformance test suite for the "Candidate Recommendation", but that is probably good enough. any other test suites that anybody would know of? thanks a lot and cheers, erik wilde tel:+1-510-6421464 - fax:+1-510-6425814
dret@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - http://dret.net/netdret/
School of Information - UC Berkeley (ISchool/UCB)
|
