Re: second implementation of XSLT 2.0?
On 11/23/05, Jim Melton <jim.melton@xxxxxxx> wrote: > At 11/23/2005 07:29 AM, Elliotte Harold wrote: > > Not so. It's dangerous to make broad generalizations, particularly when > the maker is not part of the environment about which the generalizations > are being made. > > Actually, as dangerous as you suggest it to be the generalizations are quite easy to make when your someone like Elliotte and have a keen understanding of both the process, the technology, and the politics involved in such environments. You're not as much of a mystery as you seem to suggest. Oh, and I not only fully back Bob's comments but would add to them that you really should avoid coming across as a snotty know it all that 'mingles' with the common folk only when it seems necessary to place them in proper pecking order. I don't know who you are and as such I am not saying this with some sort of vengeance... I simply read your comments and began to laugh at the level of arrogance that was portrayed. Sorry, insult my friends colleagues and I will ensure they know that I stand behind them 100% as the work they do is a lot more significant than it seems you realize. -- <M:D/> M. David Peterson http://www.xsltblog.com
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format