RE: Transforming XML Blockquotes - Mixed Content - XSL

Play the video

Subject: RE: Transforming XML Blockquotes - Mixed Content - XSLT 1.0 Solution
From: "Edward Bryant" <bryant_edward@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:59:42 -0500

It's not so much that I even want to use DOE, as I feel as if I am being pushed into it. It seems as if the alternative is either (1) the possibility of an overly complex solution, (2) living with bugs introduced by IE, (3) present the document text in a grammatically incorrect manner, or (4) change the source XML to a more IE friendly but logically incorrect format.

Isn't DOE the lesser of the 4 evils?

I guess that's why I asked the question, because I am both [expletive deleted] that there is no easy solution for a common situation and, without the level of experience of others here, I feel unable to differentiate between the "evils" of the choices I am now faced with.

How did the creators of XSL envision the handling of these nested block level elements?

Current Thread
RE: Transforming XML Blockquotes - Mixed Content - XSLT 1.0 Solution Edward Bryant - 20 Apr 2005 20:25:30 -0000 <= Wendell Piez - 20 Apr 2005 21:51:13 -0000 Michael Kay - 20 Apr 2005 22:07:58 -0000 <Possible follow-ups> David Carlisle - 20 Apr 2005 22:24:18 -0000 Edward Bryant - 27 Apr 2005 19:56:49 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: conditional position(), Wendell Piez	Thread	RE: Transforming XML Blockquo, Wendell Piez
conditional position(), Bruce D'Arcus	Date	Re: breaking string into subs, Dimitre Novatchev
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >