Re: following-sibling and xsl:sort

On 4/28/05, Karl Stubsjoen <kstubs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Is the obvious (and only) solution to use xxx:node-set against
> transformed / sorted XML?

The answer follows from the fact that XSLT is Turing-complete.
Therefore, any problem, which has solution using the xxx:node-set()
extension function should have a solution without using it.

In the case of grouping and then sorting, one such pure XSLT 1.0
solution can be found at:

       http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/200311/msg00659.html


Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev