[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: exsl:node-set in xalan

Subject: RE: exsl:node-set in xalan
From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 11:36:52 -0000
exsl node set xalan
I haven't had a chance to analyze this yet (and I may not be able to
this week), but one quick point is that wherever the Saxon performance
problem is, it's not actually in exsl:node-set(). That's because all
that exsl:node-set() does is to flip a bit saying that the tree can be
used as a normal document.

The problem (or opportunity for improvement!) is much more likely to be
in optimization of copying operations on trees.

An observation, on line 65 of incelim.xsl

	<xsl:copy-of select="exsl:node-set($rng)"/>

there is no need for a call on exsl:node-set() here. You can copy an RTF
directly.

Michael Kay 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> David Tolpin
> Sent: 17 January 2004 06:10
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re:  exsl:node-set in xalan
> 
> 
> [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> > 
> > Not sure this helps, but I get 12 sec for the shell script & only
> > 3.5 with the stylesheet using 3 rinses on xhtml.rng. This is 
> > with Saxon 6.5.3 on RedHat with a 2.4GHz proc. Sounds like it 
> > might still be something environmental rather than Saxon. 
> > 
> 
> I've been able to reproduce the result for xhtml with JDK 
> 1.4.1/HotSpot (the
> original results where with 1.3.1_08/OpenJIT, which launches 
> faster and runs
> slower), but it does not change the trend. While the 
> relatively small xhtml
> (which is a toy for the application) is faster, the larger 
> TEI or DocBook are
> still much slower. With JDK 1.4.1/HotSpot, the stylesheet version is 
>     3 times faster than the script version for Xhmtl, 80Kb, 
> but 2.5 times slower with DocBook, which is 900Kb.
> 
> In practice, stylesheets can be larger than DocBook in the 
> example (docbook
> with MathML and SVG, for example). But whether a stylesheet 
> is large or small,
> why the dependency is so steep in both SAXON and jd.xslt?
> 
> This behaviour is also exhibited by jd.xslt, but not by Xalan. 
> Xalan consistenly runs the stylesheet version faster on any 
> data with exsl
> stylesheet than with the script.
> 
> David Tolpin
> http://davidashen.net/
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.