RE: is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transforma

> 
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:47:23PM +0100, Tobias Reif wrote:
> > Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > > The dependancy on W3C XML Schemas makes it very very unlikely for 
> > > me.
> > I agree that dependency on WXS is a bad aspect, but I think 
> it won't 
> > be
> > required for all implementations.
> 
>   First news to me, how can you back-up that statement ?
> 
See http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#conformance

Specifically:

The XSL Working Group intends to define a conformance level for XSLT
processors that do not perform any schema processing. The detailed rules
for such a processor have yet to be defined.

Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx
work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list