Re: N : M transformation

Play the video

Subject: Re: N : M transformation
From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 00:26:22 +0100

Daniel Veillard wrote:

  heh, don't get depressed !
First until XSLT-2.0 is complete one should not "discard" it, maybe
providing more feedback is needed.

That's the spirit :)

In the meantime EXSLT is one way to label those "common" extensions. I understand that Michael want to focuse on XSLT-2 development. Maybe someone can simply write the patch needed to get Saxon to implement exslt:document, based on the existing Saxon extension (which I implemented too) this should not be too hard. Having EXSLT widely deployed will give the XSL group the time to finish XSLT-2 and XPath-2.

All the regexen realted features are another very important and useful area of XSLT/XPath 2.0.

Tobi

--
http://www.pinkjuice.com/

XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread

Re: is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation), (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: N : M transformation, Daniel Veillard	Thread	xslt2 comments (was: N : M tr, David Carlisle
Re: is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Tobias Reif	Date	RE: is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Michael Kay
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >