|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[Recent Entries]
[Reply To This Message]
Re: is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transforma
Subject: Re: is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation)
From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 15:50:21 +0100
|
Michael Kay wrote:
But they have to pay the price of vastly increased complexity
in the specification (and one assumes in the text books that
will follow).
If they were paying, either for the specs or for the products, then they
might have more ability to influence the outcome...
If it's true that $s rules the development of the specs (XSLT etc) more
than anything else, then that's a very sad state of affairs IMHO.
Tobi
--
http://www.pinkjuice.com/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
- RE: is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation), (continued)
- Michael Kay - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 09:07:24 -0500 (EST)
- TP - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 09:35:22 -0500 (EST)
- TP - Wed, 5 Feb 2003 08:57:02 -0500 (EST)
- Jeni Tennison - Wed, 5 Feb 2003 09:28:00 -0500 (EST)
- Tobias Reif - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 09:49:27 -0500 (EST) <=
- Michael Kay - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:25:09 -0500 (EST)
- Jeff Kenton - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:38:56 -0500 (EST)
- Tobias Reif - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 13:30:16 -0500 (EST)
- David Carlisle - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 09:52:58 -0500 (EST)
|
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
|
| Atom 0.3 |
|
|
Cart
