|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[Recent Entries]
[Reply To This Message]
Re: is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transforma
Subject: Re: is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation)
From: Jeff Kenton <jkenton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 12:40:43 -0500
|
Michael Kay wrote:
Actually it's probably just as well that participating in the standards
process is so expensive (more in time and expenses than in W3C
membership fees, incidentally). If more people took part, the process
would take even longer, and the specs would be even more complicated.
Therefore, if you did it yourself, we'd have it quicker and it would be better. Might work!
--
--------------------------
Jeff Kenton
DataPower Technology, Inc.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
- Re: [design question], (continued)
- TP - Wed, 5 Feb 2003 08:57:02 -0500 (EST)
- Jeni Tennison - Wed, 5 Feb 2003 09:28:00 -0500 (EST)
- Tobias Reif - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 09:49:27 -0500 (EST)
- Michael Kay - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:25:09 -0500 (EST)
- Jeff Kenton - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:38:56 -0500 (EST) <=
- Tobias Reif - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 13:30:16 -0500 (EST)
- David Carlisle - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 09:52:58 -0500 (EST)
- Michael Kay - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:21:17 -0500 (EST)
- David Carlisle - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:59:32 -0500 (EST)
|
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
|
| Atom 0.3 |
|
|
Cart
