RE: Locating Things Relative to Location of Style Shee

I just tried to google 'xpath 2 relax ng schema' and did not come up with
anything meaningfull, so i would like to display my ignorance and ask - why use
W3C Shema? I assume becuase RNG came out later. Is there any interoperability
between the two different schema languages(?) in XPath 2? If I like RNG, will I
be able to use that in/for/with(?) XPath2?

I guess, I mean why use W3 Schema when Relax NG is so nice, simple, clean and
well documented? I like the idea of using schemas in XSL/XPath, but not if it is
W3C Schema.

befuddled,
-Rob



> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of G. Ken Holman
> Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 6:14 AM

> As has been said it would be very nice to have some of the additional
> features and functionalities to make working with XML easier than some of
> the gyrations necessary for concurred limitations of XPath 1.0 ... but not
> at the expense of the encumbrances of W3C Schema.
>
> XPath 1.0 was based on XML and Namespaces ... XPath 2.0 is not: it is based
> on W3C Schema.  Why can we not have an XPath 2.0 based on XML and then some
> W3C Schema thingy or W3C Query thingy that is based on the PSVI?
>
>



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list