[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper

Subject: RE: fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper
From: "bryan" <bry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 16:41:55 +0200
fo wrapper

>The difference between fo:inline and fo:wrapper is that the
>wrapper only holds inheritable properties for the areas
>within, while the fo:inline generates areas. This means a
>fo:inline can have a border, background, space-start and
>space-end and padding and a few other bits, while a
>fo:wrapper cannot. 

Does this mean then, that if I have a structure like this:

fo:wrapper
 fo:block
 /fo:block
fo:block span="all"
 /fo:block
fo:block
 /fo:block
/fo:wrapper

in a two-column page that the fo:block with span="all" should then be
able to span without a problem?



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.