[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper

Subject: Re: fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper
From: David Tolpin <dvd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:51:39 +0500 (AMST)
fo wrapper
> 
> Does this mean then, that if I have a structure like this:
> 
> fo:wrapper
>  fo:block
>  /fo:block
> fo:block span="all"
>  /fo:block
> fo:block
>  /fo:block
> /fo:wrapper
> 
> in a two-column page that the fo:block with span="all" should then be
> able to span without a problem?
> 

The recommendation is clear on this issue; it states
that span="all" only works on areas returned by a flow; 
and then the answer to your question is 'yes, it should'.

In the upcoming release of XEP (with implementation of span among
other things) it spans without a problem :-)

David


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.