Re: Hello World
> bug. But what's worse: If you change it to a stylesheet which produces > valid xml output, Mozilla crashes - at least on my system. I also confirm this.....geez, dont the nice people at Mozilla org understand that a valid XSLT processor is something that is important ( ok not all important), there are at least 20-30 bugs ( from very small to 'not gonna use this' ), not too mention that sJS cripting control of XSLT transforms uses another syntax, yes I understand but why not step back a little for compatibility / interoperabilities sake, the idea of distributing processing was heralded a long time ago, but remains a dream on the clientside, most of which i put down to forced differentiation for product reasons rather then technical. I remember seeing somewhere a few years ago an XSLT torture test, is there such a thing as a conformance suite of XSLT tests anywhere ? Also why haven't any of the browsers made it easy to plug in 'something else' I envisage a simple JAXP/TRAX (any comment on c/c++ effort would be great ) type handling thingy, In fact I see a very simple standard scripting language that is in xml syntax ( bypassing all JS type script ) that handles JAXP type operations..... I would rather have heterogeneity in my choices of XSLT processor, rather then in my output. cheers, jim fuller XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format