Re: Is this about grouping ?

Hi Benoit,

David's tackled the issue about you using following-sibling:: when you
don't need to - you can just access the children of the relevant
elements.

> 2. the issues about indentation is shown in that result. I think for
> better readability ,it would be much better if the result is as
> follow :
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <topic>
>     <RqUID>ItemA</RqUID>
>     <SDR>ItemB</SDR>
>     <Contact>
>         <ContactLine>
>             <Detail>
>                 <Name>111Alpha</Name>
>                 <Reference>text3</Reference>
>             </Detail>
>             <Info>text4</Info>
>             <Detail>
>                 <Name>111Alpha</Name>
>                 <Reference>text3</Reference>
>             </Detail>
>             <Info>text4</Info>
>             <Detail>
>                 <Name>111Alpha</Name>
>                 <Reference>text3</Reference>
>             </Detail>
>             <Info>text4</Info>
>         </ContactLine>
>     </Contact>
> </topic>

I agree.  Thankfully that kind of indentation is very easy to get with
the xsl:output element:

<xsl:output indent="yes" />

In the above, indentation follows the structure of the XML nesting.
The issues with indentation in your previous posts were when you had
indentation that didn't follow the nesting of the XML.

Cheers,

Jeni

---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list