[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Saxon vs. MSXML vs. XALAN

Subject: Re: Saxon vs. MSXML vs. XALAN
From: James Melton <james.melton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:12:54 -0400
saxon vs xalan
There another issue you may want to consider. If your company is already
using Xalan, you are doing something of a disservice in introducing
another XSLT processor (unless of course you are making a strategic,
company-wide decision and everyone will eventually use your selection).

kfricovsky wrote:
> 
> Currently we use XALAN here at work.
> 
> I've been pushing to start using SAXON, because it is what I am most
> familiar with, but I also have heard good things about MSXML.
> 
> I'm just wondering... Should I look into MSXML instead?
> 
> Does any particlar processor have greater benefits than the other?
> 
> Looking for your objective opinion,
> 
> Thanks...
> 
> -Kevin
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

-- 

____________________________________________________________
James Melton                 CyLogix
609.750.5190                 609.750.5100
james.melton@xxxxxxxxxxx     www.cylogix.com

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.