Re: Saxon vs. MSXML vs. XALAN

On Tue, Jun 19 '01 at 10:59, kfricovsky wrote:
> Currently we use XALAN here at work.
> 
> I've been pushing to start using SAXON, because it is what I am most
> familiar with, but I also have heard good things about MSXML.
Xalan and Saxon are both Java programe, MSXML only works on Windows.
 
> I'm just wondering... Should I look into MSXML instead?
I go with saxon, where ever I can, but I use MSXML 3.0(sp1) for
Clientside XSL-T (it's limited for IE only, but thats ok for these
special cases)

    Goetz.

Attachment: pgp00011.pgp
Description: PGP signature