Subject: Re: browsers with XSL capabilities
From: Peter Flynn <peter@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 16:49:33 +0000
|
On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, you wrote:
> <sarcasm>
> Why bother with XML in the first place, with MS-Word and MS-Excel who really
> cares ... ;-)
> </sarcasm>
For transient text, exactly. I suggest that 90% of the content
being created does not last much beyond a year, or is just not
important: designing beautiful but complex systems to handle it
may simply not be worthwhile.
///Peter
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
- Re: browsers with XSL capabilities, (continued)
- Larry Garfield - Fri, 16 Mar 2001 21:28:28 -0500 (EST)
- Robert Koberg - Fri, 16 Mar 2001 21:40:07 -0500 (EST)
- Larry Garfield - Fri, 16 Mar 2001 22:16:35 -0500 (EST)
- Jamie - Fri, 16 Mar 2001 22:41:35 -0500 (EST)
- Peter Flynn - Sat, 17 Mar 2001 12:10:01 -0500 (EST) <=
- Robert Koberg - Fri, 16 Mar 2001 23:14:10 -0500 (EST)
- Larry Garfield - Sat, 17 Mar 2001 00:04:05 -0500 (EST)
- Peter Flynn - Sat, 17 Mar 2001 12:09:42 -0500 (EST)
- Robert Koberg - Sat, 17 Mar 2001 12:51:23 -0500 (EST)
|
|