Re: XSLT 1.1 comments

> 
> > Maybe one of this days you'll explain why this cannot be done with
> > XSLT 1.0. 
> 
> Maybe it could be with some extra agreed conventions external to XSL
> (which is I think what you are arguing for) but the current situation in
> XSLT 1.0 is th exsl:choose mess that I posted earlier. Where the
> implementation of the extension function is in a different namespace for
> each processor.

The agreed-upon separate convention is a cleaner approach, and if it succeeds, 
it will effect much better interop than xsl:script/my-fave-binding.

Doesn't this mean it should be given a try first?


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                               Principal Consultant
uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx               +1 303 583 9900 x 101
Fourthought, Inc.                         http://Fourthought.com 
4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA
Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list