RE: XSLT 1.1 comments
Michael Kay said: > I would add to what James said, a reminder that XSLT 1.0 does not define > any notion of a stylesheet being "100% XSLT compliant". There are things As someone who's invested quite a bit of energy running around giving developers talks on "writing portable XSLT", I will agree that even XSLT 1.0 is not guaranteed to be portable. But most developers who I've talked to are surprised that "portable XSLT" is actually different from "XSLT 1.0". So I hope we haven't given up on portable XSLT - sure there are warts, but this is version 1.0 right? Surely nobody is suggesting that, since portability is not guaranteed in 1.0, we should just forget about it altogether? Users really do care about portability, and I hope I haven't been wasting my time encouraging them.. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format