Re: New XSL working draft published
Nikolai, Thanks for providing this link. It helps me tremendously. I second Sebastian's motion that the XSL working group review it and either approve it, or release a conforming version if they reject it. I understand that there are parts of XSL that cannot be represented in XML syntax, but a DTD can still get you 95% of the way there, which is much better than nothing. Rick Geimer National Semiconductor rick.geimer@xxxxxxx Nikolai Grigoriev wrote: > > Rick, > > > I complained about the lack of a DTD for XSL-FO to the editors several > > times, but they seem disinterested in providing one. Perhaps more arm > > twisting from concerned users and implementors is in order? > > at mid July, we have published a DTD for March 27 XSL FO WD at > http://www.renderx.com/Tests/validator/fo2000.dtd.html. It was also used by > FOP team to check their tests. Certainly, it is unofficial - it has not been > approved (not even commented) by the XSL WG. The WD of yesterday changed > only slightly from that of March, therefore I hope to publish a revised DTD > quite soon. > > Best regards, > > Nikolai Grigoriev > RenderX > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format